【Taste of a Married Woman】
Local television stations count on Taste of a Married Womanelections to provide a quadrennial flood of cash, but this year, Donald Trump's anemic ad spending has left them wanting.
Despite earlier projections that suggested a record-breaking bump this election cycle, it seems the GOP nominee's reluctance to spend sunk those hopes, according to a new report from media forecast firm Magna.
SEE ALSO: Here is the Donald Trump campaign's first TV adInstead, the Clinton camp has been filling the gap, bumping local political spending up 3 percent from 2012 -- a measly sum compared to the lofty 15 percent expected.
You May Also Like
It's just one of many conventional predictions that Trump's erratic campaign upended this year.
By comparison, total local TV spending grew 10 percent with close to $3 billion in political ads constituting just a small chunk of the $23 billion market.
Trump's mostly ad-free rise led some pundits to prematurely doubt the effectiveness of political ads, a notion the nominee himself encouraged.
"You almost say, do ads mean anything?" Trump said in May. "I think we're going to hurt the industry pretty much because people are going to say, 'What does an ad mean?'"
But as with many Trump-related outliers, the pronouncement's prediction power seems to be limited to a subject pool of one.
"Skeptics have persistently overlooked the elephant in the room: Trump is a TV celebrity," wrote Mark Lieberman, CEO of media analytics firm Tivo Research, in a recent op-ed. "'The Donald' had the benefit of more than a decade of weekly primetime TV exposure."
The lukewarm returns have also been supplemented by narrow local, gubernatorial and congressional races, which account for about two thirds of political spending.
The one prediction that didn't end up a bust was the migration of ad dollars from TV to digital.
A report from Borrell & Associates last year pegged this election as a record-breaking year for digital mediums, and it seems the numbers haven't disappointed.
Trump has embraced these ads much more openly, even outspending Clinton on digital marketing in June with expenses of $1.6 million on online ads and digital consulting, according to the campaign's Federal Election Committee filing.
Topics Donald Trump Elections Hillary Clinton
Search
Categories
Latest Posts
The Ovid of Loserdom
2025-06-26 00:15Forget about hailing an Uber on your next visit to China
2025-06-25 23:49America, you may be sleepwalking into a Trump presidency. Still.
2025-06-25 23:09I went to the World Series and still can't believe what I saw
2025-06-25 23:05Thwarting a “United Right” in Charlottesville
2025-06-25 22:45Popular Posts
Walking Away from Omelas
2025-06-26 00:26Indian government issues 24
2025-06-26 00:21'Overwatch' World Cup: 8 teams battle for their countries' glory
2025-06-25 23:45Sex, Lies, and Videotape
2025-06-25 22:24Featured Posts
I’ll Be Watching You
2025-06-26 00:59Smart oven designed with one purpose: baking you warm, fresh cookies
2025-06-25 23:56Germany's crackdown over online hate speech reaches Mark Zuckerberg
2025-06-25 23:18Juggalos, Nevertheless Persisting
2025-06-25 23:17Popular Articles
We Shall Be Terrible
2025-06-26 00:29Your slacktivism isn't as useless as everyone thinks
2025-06-25 23:25Fucking the Patriarch
2025-06-25 23:00Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates.
Comments (9872)
Steady Information Network
Reinventing the Wheel
2025-06-26 00:13Leadership Information Network
The chunky Samsung Gear S3 smartwatch costs more than an Apple Watch
2025-06-25 23:17Ignition Information Network
Welcome to 2016: Here's that Ariana Grande and Stevie Wonder duet
2025-06-25 23:13Inspiration Information Network
Facebook’s $200MM satellite wouldn’t have been enough to bring Sub Saharan Africa online
2025-06-25 22:52Prosperous Times Information Network
Russia’s Zombie Election
2025-06-25 22:47